Use the GPIO accessor macros instead of copying raw register access code all
over the place. This is cleaner and less error prone.
This fixes the setting of the USB pull-up resistor that worked only by chance on
the CC2538DK because it is controlled by the pin 0 of the used GPIO port.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
Introduce new useful GPIO macros to:
- read the levels of some port pins,
- write the levels of some port pins (pass bit-field value to be set),
- clear the interrupt flags for some port pins.
These macros are cleaner and less error prone than raw register access code
copied all over the place.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
The parameters in the GPIO macros were used without being parenthesized. This
could generate wrong values for register assignments in the case of expressions
passed as arguments to these macros.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
lpm_enter() must not enter PM1+ if the UART TX FIFO is not empty. Otherwise, the
UART clock gets disabled, and its TX is broken.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
Some peripherals have their clocks automatically gated in PM1+ modes, so they
cannot operate. This new mechanism gives peripherals a way to prohibit PM1+
modes so that they can properly complete their current operations before
entering PM1+.
This mechanism is implemented with peripheral functions registered to the LPM
module. These functions return whether the associated peripheral permits or not
PM1+ modes. They are called by the LPM module each time PM1+ might be possible.
If any of the peripherals wants to block PM1+, then the system is only dropped
to PM0.
Partly from: George Oikonomou
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
ELF files generated by GCC make SmartRF Flash Programmer 2 crash (only the TI
format is supported by this tool for ELFs), and binary files are not very
appropriate because they are gapless, so generate Intel HEX files since these
are very well supported by most programming tools while still flexible.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
rm -f can still fail, e.g., if trying to delete a directory.
If there was, say, a directory called "core", a "make clean" would
therefore only try to delete the files listed in the first command but
not proceed with the rest of the cleanup.
"make clean" itself failing may also affect any outside build process
that invokes it.
