Update Bundler to 1.0.15.
Update Rails to 2.3.12.
Update rails_xss plugin.
The latter two were the
source of a considerable
amount of grief, as rails_xss
is now MUCH stricter about what
string methods can be used.
Also made it possible to use
rake 0.9.x with Instiki. But
you probably REALLY want to use
ruby bundle exec rake ...
instead of just saying
rake ....
Use Bundler to manage RedCloth
gem. 4.x should be much faster
and less buggy. Unfortunately,
it doesn't support mixed
Textile/Markdown syntax. So
we keep an (appropriately
renamed) copy of 3.x around,
for the users of the "Mixed"
text filter.
Completely removed the html5lib sanitizer.
Fixed the string-handling to work in both
Ruby 1.8.x and 1.9.2. There are still,
inexplicably, two functional tests that
fail. But the rest seems to work quite well.
itex2MML 1.3.16 add a \tooltip{}{} command which,
like \statusline{}{}, produces an <maction> element.
Neither of these is natively supported by Mozilla/Firefox.
Add some Javascript to work around that weakness.
Implements \mathrlap{}, \mathllap{}, and \mathclap{}.
Deprecates the use of \rlap{} (use \mathrlap{}, instead:
the latter works in math-mode in the LaTeX export, whereas
TeX's \rlap{} did not).
Web#files_path and Web#blatex_pngs_path now return Pathname objects.
Based on JHerdman's
5d1e8f420b
but requires several other changes to the code (which assumed a string).
Also, test for itex2MML 1.3.10 (you should update that too).
1. Ensure that "rollback" respects locked pages.
2. Expire revisions of an edited page. Use a before_save
hook to deal with the situation where a page's name
has been changed.
Add support, in the LaTeX export, for blackboard bold
digits and lowercase latin letters. If these are
present, LaTeX will
\usepackage{mathbbol}
N.B.: this uses the stmaryrd font for blackboard bold
letters, instead of the msbm font.
Tests included. (Yes, you need to update itex2MML as well.)
Instiki now runs on the Rails 2.3.0 Candidate Release.
Among other improvements, this means that it now
automagically selects between WEBrick and Mongrel.
Just run
./instiki --daemon
On Webs with file uploads enabled, uploaded files were stored
(in version 0.16.1 and earlier) in the public/ directory.
This was a security threat. A miscreant could upload a .html file.
When a user clicked on the link to the file, it was opened (unsanitized)
in the browser.
As of version 0.16.2, uploaded files are stored in the webs/
directory. Now, when the user clicks on the link, the file is sent
with the
Content-Disposition: attachment
header set, which causes the file to be downloaded, rather than opened
in the browser. As always, files downloaded from the internets should be
treated with caution. At least, this way, they are not aoutomatically
opened in the browser.
To move your existing uploaded files to the new location, do a
rake upgrade_instiki
WikiWord (and the like) could wreak havoc in equations. Protect them
(the way <a>, <pre> and <code> blocks are protected).
For some reason, this doesn't seem to work in inline equations.
Maruku is doing something funny there ... => one failing Unit Test.
Implement amsthm-like Theorem environments with Maruku.
Support is based on Maruku "div"s with special class-names.
Classes
num_*
produce numbered environments, and
un_*
produce un-numbered environments, where * is one of
theorem (for Theorem)
lemma (for Lemma)
prop (for Proposition)
cor (for Corollary)
def (for Definition)
example (for Example)
remark (for Remark)
note (for Note)
In addition, the class
proof
produces a Proof environment.
The LaTeX export works as expected, and these also work in the S5 view.
Bumped version number.
The new sanitizer seems to work well (cuts the time required
to produce the Instiki Atom feed in half). Our strategy is to
use HTML5lib for <nowiki> content, but to use the new sanitizer
for content that has been processed by Maruku (and hence is
well-formed).
The one broken unit test won't affect us (since it dealt with
very malformed HTML).
Start work (which may not pan out) on a new sanitizer. Right now, it passes
all but 1 of the HTML5lib Sanitizer's unit tests. But it doesn't do much
of anything to ensure well-formedness. This is not an issue for Maruku-processed
content, but it is a concern for <nowiki> blocks.
(One solution would be to use the HTML5lib parser on <nowiki> blocks.)
In any case, this baby is 3 times as fast as the HTML5lib sanitizer.
Jacques Distler