Commit graph

80 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sitaram Chamarty 7124faa9f3 NAME-based restrictions
Gitolite allows you to restrict changes by file/dir name.  The syntax
for this used "PATH/" as a prefix to denote such file/dir patterns.
This has now been changed to "NAME/" because PATH is potentially
confusing.

While this is technically a backward-incompatible change, the feature
itself was hitherto undocumented, and only a few people were using it,
so I guess it's not that bad...

Also added documentation now.
2010-01-09 20:30:53 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty d03152316f install transcript 2009-12-25 01:05:21 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty b0ce84d47f document @SHELL feature, allow "info" for all,
...but still distinguish shell folks with a small extra line telling
them they have shell access
2009-12-23 19:57:36 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty ba3cbd7ecf doc/3, conf: document @all for repos
plus some refactoring of doc/3
2009-12-21 22:58:47 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 6f45f75ca1 minor docfix 2009-12-21 06:23:25 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty ed2bf526f8 minor docfix 2009-12-13 19:17:18 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 780b4cca20 ssh-copy-id workaround detail plus a couple other doc fixes 2009-12-10 17:07:46 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 64979c18ea document repo config support 2009-12-09 12:16:22 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 4441ed82e4 compile: allow full email addresses as usernames
we had usurped the email style syntax to separate multiple keys
belonging to the same person, like sitaram@desktop.pub and
sitaram@laptop.pub.  If you have so many users that you need the full
email address to disambiguate some of them (or you want to do it for
just plain convenience), you couldn't.

This patch fixes that in a backward compatible way.  See
doc/3-faq-tips-etc.mkd for details.
2009-12-08 15:14:05 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 8a4bb453a0 document that @all doesnt work as expected in deny rules
@all in a deny rule doesnt work as it might look in the config file,
because @all rights are checked last.  This is fine if you dont have any
DENYs (and so rule order doesn't matter), but with DENY it causes some
problems.

I never bothered to document it because I did not expect that any repo
that is "serious" enough to have deny rules *at all* should then allow
*any* kind of "write* access to @all.  That's a very big contradiction
in terms of paranoia!

Translation: this will not be supported.  Don't bother asking.  You know
who you are :)
2009-12-05 14:57:21 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty d71720d050 fold rebel into master :) [please read]
Well, something even more outrageous than deny rules and path-based
limits came along, so I decided that "rebel" was actually quite
"conformist" in comparision ;-)

Jokes apart, the fact is that the access control rules, even when using
deny rules and path-limits, are still *auditable*.  Which means it is
good enough for "corporate use".

[The stuff that I'm working on now takes away the auditability aspect --
individual users can "own" repos, create rules for themselves, etc.

So let's just say that is the basis of distinguishing "master" now.]
2009-12-01 07:15:05 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 601eaf8ea1 tips doc: add pointer to later section on excludes 2009-12-01 05:55:59 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 604669ca02 rebel edition -- cos when you need it, you need it bad :-)
Summary: much as I did not want to use "excludes", I guess if we don't put the
code in "master" it's OK to at least *write* (and test) the code!

See the example config file for how to use it.

See "design choices" section in the "faq, tips, etc" document for how it
works.
2009-12-01 05:55:58 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty d8cb62934f docs: document how to specify "owner" for gitweb 2009-11-27 13:47:33 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty a02a48e8f5 easy install: dont allow root, plus warn about shell access using the given key
- refuse to install to root
  - when a pubkey is being used that was not freshly created by
    ourselves, warn the user that this key can not be used to get shell
    access to the server.  Prevents some corner cases of people being
    locked out...

Also, change the final message to be even more clear that this is all on
the workstation, not the server
2009-11-26 12:13:42 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 9a85f5d0d6 auth: print permissions for @all also
I don't have a use for "@all" at all (pun not intended!) other than the
"testing" repo, but <teemu dot matilainen at iki dot fi> sent in a patch
to mark those repos with "R" and "W" in the permissions list, and I
started thinking about it.

This could actually be useful if we *differentiated* such access from
normal (explicit username) access.  From the "corporate environment"
angle, it would be nice if a project manager could quickly check if any
of his projects have erroneously been made accessible by @all.

So what we do now is print "@" in the corresponding column if "@all" has
the corresponding access.

Also, when someone has access both as himself *and* via @all, we print
the "@"; printing the "R" or "W" would hide the "@", and wouldn't
correctly satisfy the use case described above.
2009-11-25 09:15:36 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 1c786d880a doc/3: $repo_base -> $projectroot; honor @all in perm check
- it appears that what we call $repo_base, gitweb already needs as
    $projectroot
  - allow read of repos defined as readable by @all

plus some minor declaration changes to make the sample code work as is

(thanks to teemu dot matilainen at iki dot fi)
2009-11-25 08:46:21 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty de2e38c372 minor doc/message updates/clarifications 2009-11-24 09:16:29 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 23be2b6240 easy install (+doc): make it run from msys. Here's how:
- all $HOME/blah becomes "$HOME/blah" (bl**dy "Documents and Settings" crap)
  - replace bash regex with perl, and in one case replace the check with
    something else
  - rsync changed to appropriate scp
  - since we no longer insist on running from a specific directory, create
    tmpgli dir *after* you cd to the right place
2009-11-19 17:39:14 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty c727d68caa install doc: server and client requirements spelled out 2009-11-18 15:40:37 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 05a06a2c75 README, doc/3: gitweb "description" feature 2009-11-18 07:18:05 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty c54d3eabbc all src: (please read full commit message): allow local admin-defined hooks
You can now add your own hooks into src/hooks/ and they get propagated
along with the update hook that is present there now.  Please read the
new section in the admin document, and make sure you understand the
security implications of accidentally fiddling with the "update" script.

This also prompted a major rename spree of all the files to be
consistent, etc.  Plus people said that the .sh and .pl suffixes should
be avoided (and I was feeling the same way).  I've also been
inconsistent with that "gl-" prefix, so I cleaned that up, and the 00-
and 99- were also funny animals.

Time to get all this cleaned up before we get 1.0 :)

So these are the changes, in case you're looking at just the commit
message and not the diffstat:

    src/pta-hook.sh -> src/ga-post-update-hook
    src/conf-convert.pl -> src/gl-conf-convert
    src/00-easy-install.sh -> src/gl-easy-install
    src/99-emergency-addkey.sh -> src/gl-emergency-addkey
    src/install.pl -> src/gl-install
    src/update-hook.pl -> src/hooks/update
2009-11-13 18:37:46 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 76520693a3 doc/2: add docs for gitweb description, plus some minor cleanup 2009-11-12 18:54:16 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty be972d04d0 doc/6: added two keys explanation and workaround 2009-11-12 10:28:23 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty c4069dd85f (please read full commit message) upgrade behaviour changed
**upgrades no longer touch the config or the keydir**

When you first install gitolite, the easy install script has to do two
*distinct* things:

  * install the software
  * create and seed the gitolite-admin repo with a minimum config file
    and the newly created pubkey

That's fine for an install, because nothing exists yet anyway.

Subsequent invocations of the script should only do the first task (so
that gitolite itself can be upgraded), and not attempt to fiddle with
the config file and pubkeys.

Unfortunately, until now I had not been separating these two activities
cleanly enough.  For instance, the commit message for 8e47e01 said:

    IMPORTANT: we assume that $admin_name remains the same in an upgrade
    -- that's how we detect it is an upgrade!  Change that name or his
    pubkey, and you're toast!

Ouch!

So now I decided to clean things up.  The "Usage" message tells you
clearly what to do for an upgrade.

Should have been like this from the beginning, but hey we got there
eventually :)

----

Code-wise, this is a major refactor of the easy install script.  It uses
an old forgotten trick to get forward refs for bash functions ;-) and in
the process cleans up the flow quite a bit.
2009-11-06 15:37:03 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 8aecaa2da2 doc/6: rename the file, change focus completely 2009-11-05 23:13:39 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 33305ed8e7 doc/1: fix formatting problem on github
(local mkd worked fine... weird!)
2009-11-05 23:13:38 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 92d5062ad0 doc/src: major doc/help text revamp
also removed some dead code from compile (pre PTA days)
2009-10-31 00:21:37 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty b94ff910d1 doc/6: explain that all this is *only* for the admin 2009-10-30 17:42:26 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty a19a7f01d7 auth, doc/3: print useful information when no command given 2009-10-28 21:46:57 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty a23622a31b doc/3: add section on unexpected gitwebauth good-ness! 2009-10-28 21:46:57 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 593ed765a7 Merge branch 'system-install' 2009-10-28 21:46:27 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 98124596ed doc/6: no idea how but this ended up with CRLF line endings (ugh!) 2009-10-25 21:32:32 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 999513c1d9 doc/install: document the new -q flag 2009-10-25 19:23:15 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 8eefc036e0 rc, pta-hook/doc: don't assume $HOME of 'git' user is /home/git
(Thanks to Jerome Arbez-Gindre)
2009-10-23 10:23:06 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 96fa0da946 allow a/b/c type repos to be created 2009-10-23 10:14:41 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty d6dc1c0856 added doc/6: more complex ssh setups 2009-10-21 19:19:20 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 536e3198bf doc fixes...
- README: add a "what" section first, plus a few minor fixes
  - doc/5:
      - remove reference to obsolete ml branch URL; point it to the right
        place with the right section name
      - change text to reflect the fact that p-t-a is now the default!
2009-10-14 14:09:34 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 481242f6cb doc/3: minor fix to an already minor change :) 2009-10-13 11:46:04 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 59e15e62a1 support git installed outside default $PATH
(also some minor fixes to doc/3)
2009-10-13 10:03:12 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty d125488107 doc/3 minor re-arrangement 2009-10-13 10:03:12 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 9e46920fe3 faq: explain one user many keys a bit better 2009-10-12 20:02:38 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty d78bbe8c3e lots of doc changes reflecting "push to admin" is default now :)
- added comments to easy install to help do it manually
  - README: some stuff moved to tips doc, brief summary of extras
    (over gitosis) added
  - INSTALL: major revamp, easy install and manual install,
    much shorter and much more readable!

plus other docs changed as needed, and updated the tips doc to roll in
some details from "update.mkd" in the "ml" branch
2009-10-11 14:19:00 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty ccd8372bb3 aa ha! easy install script!
src/00-easy-install.sh does *everything* needed, and it's mostly
self-documented
2009-10-11 14:19:00 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty af7fd0bf2e Merge branch 'master' into delegation 2009-10-07 12:40:08 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 410c9ba46c doc/install: add missing "cd" 2009-10-07 12:33:49 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty ec2ad64b38 doc/delegation: never ending quest to write well :) 2009-10-05 19:39:55 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 8096cc8e9c install.pl, pta hook, upgrade doc:
- install the post-update hook also
  - fix bashism in pta-hook

Also, since delegation works best with PTA, reflect that in the upgrade doc
2009-10-05 16:55:14 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty fa5567f22c doc/5-delegation added, doc/4 (PTA) enhanced
This is complete user documentation for delegation
2009-10-04 10:22:41 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 5bb0850c5c p-t-a: make the post-update hook a separate file...
...and just refer to it in the doc.  This hook will acquire more code soon,
when we do delegations :)
2009-10-04 10:10:39 +05:30