9a85f5d0d6
I don't have a use for "@all" at all (pun not intended!) other than the "testing" repo, but <teemu dot matilainen at iki dot fi> sent in a patch to mark those repos with "R" and "W" in the permissions list, and I started thinking about it. This could actually be useful if we *differentiated* such access from normal (explicit username) access. From the "corporate environment" angle, it would be nice if a project manager could quickly check if any of his projects have erroneously been made accessible by @all. So what we do now is print "@" in the corresponding column if "@all" has the corresponding access. Also, when someone has access both as himself *and* via @all, we print the "@"; printing the "R" or "W" would hide the "@", and wouldn't correctly satisfy the use case described above. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| 0-INSTALL.mkd | ||
| 1-migrate.mkd | ||
| 2-admin.mkd | ||
| 3-faq-tips-etc.mkd | ||
| 5-delegation.mkd | ||
| 6-ssh-troubleshooting.mkd | ||
| COPYING | ||
| TODO | ||