gitolite/doc/4-wildcard-repositories.mkd

repositories named with wildcards

IMPORTANT NOTE:

This feature may be somewhat "brittle" in terms of security. Creating repositories based on wild cards, giving "ownership" to the specific user who created it, allowing him/her to hand out R and RW permissions to other users to collaborate, all these are possible. And any of these could have a bug in it. I haven't found any yet, but that doesn't mean there aren't any.

Also, there are some limitations. For example, you cannot specify gitconfig values for a wildcard repo; it only works for actual repos.

There may be other such missing features. Sometimes it's just not possible to make it work. Or it may be cumbersome enough that unless there are no workarounds I may not have the time to code it right away.

---

In this document:

• rc file setting required
• wildcard repos
  • wildcard repos with creator name in them
  • wildcard repos without creator name in them
• side-note: line-anchored regexes
  • contrast with refexes
• handing out rights to wildcard-matched repos
• setting a gitweb description for a wildcard-matched repo
• reporting
• other issues and discussion
• how it actually works

---

This document is mostly "by example".

---

rc file setting required

This feature requires that you set $GL_WILDREPOS to "1" in ~/.gitolite.rc on the server. Please search for that variable and see comments around it in conf/example.gitolite.rc for more information on this.

wildcard repos

Which of these alternatives you choose depends on your needs, and the social aspects of your environment. The first one is a little more rigid, making it harder to make mistakes, and the second is more flexible and trusting.

wildcard repos with creator name in them

Here's an example snippet:

@prof       =   u1
@TAs        =   u2 u3
@students   =   u4 u5 u6

repo    assignments/CREATOR/a[0-9][0-9]
    C   =   @students
    RW+ =   CREATOR
    RW  =   WRITERS @TAs
    R   =   READERS @prof

For now, ignore the special usernames READERS and WRITERS, and just create a new repo, as user "u4" (a student):

$ git clone git@server:assignments/u4/a12
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/sitaram/t/a12/.git/
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/gitolite/repositories/assignments/u4/a12.git/
warning: You appear to have cloned an empty repository.

Notice the two empty repo inits, and the order in which they occur ;-)

wildcard repos without creator name in them

Here's how the same example would look if you did not want the CREATOR's name to be part of the actual repo name.

repo    assignments/a[0-9][0-9]
    C   =   @students
    RW+ =   CREATOR
    RW  =   WRITERS @TAs
    R   =   READERS @prof

We haven't changed anything except the repo name pattern. This means that the first student that creates, say, assignments/a12 becomes the owner. Mistakes (such as claiming a12 instead of a13) need to be rectified by an admin logging on to the back end, though it's not too difficult.

You could also repace the C line like this:

    C   =   @TAs

and have a TA create the repos in advance.

In either case, they could then use the setperms feature to specify which users are "READERS" and which are "WRITERS". See later for details.

side-note: line-anchored regexes

A regex like

repo assignments/S[0-9]+/A[0-9]+

would match assignments/S02/A37. It will not match assignments/S02/ABC, or assignments/S02/a37, obviously.

But you may be surprised to find that it does not match even assignments/S02/A37/B99. This is because internally, gitolite line-anchors the given regex; so that regex actually becomes ^assignments/S[0-9]+/A[0-9]+$ -- notice the line beginning and ending metacharacters.

contrast with refexes

Just for interest, note that this is in contrast to the refexes for the normal "branch" permissions, as described in conf/example.conf and elsewhere. These "refexes" are only anchored at the start; a pattern like refs/heads/master actually can match refs/heads/master01/bar as well, even if no one will actually push such a branch! You can anchor both sides if you really care, by using master$ instead of master, but that is not the default for refexes.

handing out rights to wildcard-matched repos

In the examples above, we saw two special "user" names: READERS and WRITERS. The permissions they have are controlled by the config file, but who is part of this list is controlled by the person who created the repository.

The use case is that, although our toy example has only 3 students, in reality there will be a few dozen, but each assignment will be worked on only by a handful from among those. This allows the creator to take ad hoc sets of users from among the actual users in the system, and place them into one of two categories (whose permissions are, in this example, R and RW respectively). In theory you could do the same thing by creating lots of little "assignment-NN" groups in the config file but that may be a little too cumbersome for non-secret environments.

Create a small text file that contains the permissions you desire:

$ cat > myperms
R u5
RW u6
(hit ctrl-d here)

...and use the new "setperms" command to set permissions for your repo:

$ ssh git@server setperms assignments/u4/a12 < myperms
New perms are:
R u5
RW u6

'setperms' will helpfully print what the new permissions are but you can also use 'getperms' to check:

$ ssh git@server getperms assignments/u4/a12
R u5
RW u6

The following points are important:

• note the syntax of the commands; it's not a "git" command, and there's no : like in a repo URL. The first space-separated word is R or RW, and the rest are simple usernames.

• whoever you specify as "R" will match the special user READERS. "RW" will match WRITERS.

setting a gitweb description for a wildcard-matched repo

Similar to the getperm/setperm commands, there are the getdesc/setdesc commands, thanks to Teemu.

reporting

In order to see what repositories were created from a wildcard, use the "expand" command, described briefly in doc/report-output.mkd.

other issues and discussion

• what if the repo name being pushed matches more than one pattern?

  I think it would be very hard to reason about access if we were to do something like combine all the access rights in all the matching patterns. No matter how you do it, and how carefully you document it, there'll be someone who is surprised by the result.

  And in security, that's a Bad Thing.

  So we don't combine permissions. At runtime, we die if we find more than one match. Let 'em go holler at the admin for creating multiple matching repo patterns :-)

  This can make some repos inaccessible if the patterns changed after they were created. The administrator should be careful not to do this. Most of the time, it won't be difficult; the fixed prefix will usually be different anyway so there won't be overlaps.

how it actually works

This section tells you what is happening inside gitolite so you can understand this feature better. Let's use the config example at the beginning of this document:

repo    assignments/CREATOR/a[0-9][0-9]
    C   =   @students
    RW+ =   CREATOR
    RW  =   WRITERS @TAs
    R   =   READERS @prof

First we find the set of rules to apply. This involves replacing the special words CREATOR, WRITERS, and READERS with appropriate usernames to derive an "effective" ruleset for the repo in question.

For a new repo, replace the word CREATOR in all repo patterns and rules with the name of the invoking user.

(Note: this is why you should never use C = CREATOR; it becomes C = invoking_user! Unless you really want to allow all users to create repos, you should restrict "C" perms to an actual user or set of users, like in the examples in this document).

For an existing repo, do the same but replace with the name of the user who actually created the repo (this name is recorded in a special file in the repo directory when the repo is first created, so it is available).

Now find a repo pattern that matches the actual reponame being pushed -- this tells you which set of rules to apply. Only one pattern is allowed to match; matching more than one is an error.

If the invoking user has been given "RW" permissions using setperms, all occurrences of the word WRITERS are replaced by the invoking username. Otherwise -- and this includes the "new repo" case, since you couldn't have run setperms on a non-existant repo -- they are replaced by "NOBODY".

(The same thing is done with "R" access and the word "READERS".)

At this point we have an effective ruleset, and the normal access rules (R, RW, etc) apply, with the addition that the invoking user needs "C" access to be able to create a repo.

(Note: "C" rights do not automatically give the CREATOR any other rights; they must be specifically given. RW+ = CREATOR is recommended in most situations, as you can see in our example).

Assuming user "u4" trying to push-create a new repo called assignments/u4/a23, this is what the effective ruleset looks like (we're ignoring the "NOBODY" business):

repo    assignments/u4/a23
    C   =   @students
    RW+ =   u4
    RW  =   @TAs
    R   =   @prof

If u4 gives "RW" perms to u5 using setperms, and u5 tries to access that repo, the ruleset looks like:

repo    assignments/u4/a23
    C   =   @students
    RW+ =   u4
    RW  =   u5 @TAs
    R   =   @prof

I hope that helps.

---

Enjoy, and please use with care. This is pretty powerful stuff. As they say: if you break it, you get to keep both pieces :)