gitolite/README.mkd
Sitaram Chamarty 200db6e486 user-manual added ("user" as opposed to "admin")
Normally, I use the word "user" in gitolite to mean *my* users, who are
actually admins on their setups.  All my documentation has been geared
to that class of person.

Last night my most famous "user" (not "admin", a real gitolite user)
mentioned that he found it very hard to find info on what a *user* could
do, and he was right.  So here goes...
2011-10-29 06:28:33 +05:30

222 lines
9 KiB
Markdown

# Hosting git repositories
<a name="start"></a>
Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with
fine-grained access control and many (many!) more powerful features.
----
In this document:
* <a href="#_quick_install">quick install</a>
* <a href="#_what">what</a>
* <a href="#_documentation">documentation</a>
* <a href="#_why">why</a>
* <a href="#_main_features">main features</a>
* <a href="#_security">security</a>
* <a href="#_contact_and_license">contact and license</a>
----
<a name="_quick_install"></a>
### quick install
If you're comfortable with Unix and ssh, the following steps should work.
<font color="gray">(However, gitolite has lots and lots of useful features;
don't miss out on them by skipping the excellent
[documentation][docs]!)</font>
* create a user called `git`. Login to this user.
* copy your ssh pubkey from your workstation. Rename it to `YourName.pub`.
* now run these commands:
git clone git://github.com/sitaramc/gitolite
cd gitolite
src/gl-system-install
gl-setup ~/YourName.pub
You're done.
A word of caution: do **NOT** add repos or users directly on the server! You
MUST manage the server by cloning the special 'gitolite-admin' repo on your
workstation (`git clone git@server:gitolite-admin`), making changes, and
pushing them. See [here][aur] for how to add users and repos.
[aur]: http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite/doc/2-admin.html#_adding_users_and_repos
<a name="_what"></a>
### what
Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git. Here's an "executive
summary":
* use a single unix user ("real" user) on the server
* provide access to many gitolite users
* they are not "real" users
* they do not get shell access
* control access to many git repositories
* read access controlled at the repo level
* write access controlled at the branch/tag/file/directory level,
including who can rewind, create, and delete branches/tags
* can be installed without root access, assuming git and perl are already
installed
* authentication is most commonly done using sshd, but you can also use
httpd if you prefer (this may require root access).
* several other neat features described below and elsewhere in the
[doc/][docs] directory.
<a name="_documentation"></a>
#### documentation
Gitolite comes with a **huge** amount of documentation. Almost all of it is
for the *administrator* of a gitolite server. If you're a *user*, you only
need [this][user].
Otherwise, the suggested reading order is this:
* the README (this document) for a quick intro
* the [INSTALL][install] document
* the most common installation issues are caused by ssh. Here's how
[gitolite uses ssh][doc9gas]. And here's an [ssh trouble
shooting][doc6sts] document
* the [ADMIN][admin] document
* (if you're migrating from gitosis, read [this][migr])
There is also a **[master TOC of all gitolite documentation][docs]**; use your
browser's search function to look for likely sounding words or just browse
around -- you never know what you'll find!
[Here][who]'s some information on some of the projects and
people using gitolite (and who, in turn, have helped shape its features).
<a name="_why"></a>
### why
Gitolite is separate from git, and needs to be installed and configured. So...
why do we bother?
Gitolite is useful in any server that is going to host multiple git
repositories, each with many developers, where some sort of access control is
required.
In theory, this can be done with plain old Unix permissions: each user is a
member of one or more groups, each group "owns" one or more repositories, and
using unix permissions (especially the setgid bit -- `chmod g+s`) you can
allow/disallow users access to repos.
But there are several disadvantages here:
* every user needs a userid and password on the server. This is usually a
killer, especially in tightly controlled environments
* adding/removing access rights involves complex `usermod -G ...` mumblings
which most admins would rather not deal with
* *viewing* (aka auditing) the current set of permissions requires running
multiple commands to list directories and their permissions/ownerships,
users and their group memberships, and then correlating all these manually
* auditing historical permissions or permission changes is pretty much
impossible without extraneous tools
* errors or omissions in setting the permissions exactly can cause problems
of either kind: false accepts or false rejects
* without going into ACLs it is not possible to give some people read-only
access while some others have read-write access to a repo (unless you make
it world-readable). Group access just doesn't have enough granularity
* it is absolutely impossible to restrict pushing by branch name or tag
name.
Gitolite does away with all this:
* it uses ssh magic to remove the need to give actual unix userids to
developers
* it uses a simple but powerful config file format to specify access rights
* access control changes are affected by modifying this file, adding or
removing user's public keys, and "compiling" the configuration
* this also makes auditing trivial -- all the data is in one place, and
changes to the configuration are also logged, so you can audit them.
* finally, the config file allows distinguishing between read-only and
read-write access, not only at the repository level, but at the branch
level within repositories.
<a name="_main_features"></a>
### main features
The most important feature I needed was **per-branch permissions**. This is
pretty much mandatory in a corporate environment, and is almost the single
reason I started *thinking* about writing gitolite.
It's not just "read-only" versus "read-write". Rewinding a branch (aka "non
fast forward push") is potentially dangerous, but sometimes needed. So is
deleting a branch (which is really just an extreme form of rewind). I needed
something in between allowing anyone to do it (the default) and disabling it
completely (`receive.denyNonFastForwards` or `receive.denyDeletes`).
Here're **some more features**. All of them, and more, are documented in
detail somewhere in gitolite's [doc/][docs] subdirectory.
* simple, yet powerful, config file syntax, including specifying
gitweb/daemon access. You'll need this power if you manage lots of
users+repos+combinations of access
* apart from branch-name based restrictions, you can also restrict by
file/dir name changed (i.e., output of `git diff --name-only`)
* if your requirements are still too complex, you can split up the config
file and delegate authority over parts of it
* easy to specify gitweb owner, description and gitweb/daemon access
* easy to sync gitweb (http) authorisation with gitolite's access config
* comprehensive logging [aka: management does not think "blame" is just a
synonym for "annotate" :-)]
* "personal namespace" prefix for each dev
* migration guide and simple converter for gitosis conf file
* "exclude" (or "deny") rights at the branch/tag level
* specify repos using patterns (patterns may include creator's name)
* define powerful operations on the server side, even github-like forking
<a name="_security"></a>
### security
Due to the environment in which this was created and the need it fills, I
consider this a "security" program, albeit a very modest one.
For the first person to find a security hole in it, defined as allowing a
normal user (not the gitolite admin) to read a repo, or write/rewind a ref,
that the config file says he shouldn't, and caused by a bug in *code* that is
in the "master" branch, (not in the other branches, or the configuration file
or in Unix, perl, shell, etc.)... well I can't afford 1000 USD rewards like
djb, so you'll have to settle for 5000 INR (Indian Rupees) as a "token" prize
:-)
However, there are a few optional features (which must be explicitly enabled
in the RC file) where I just haven't had the time to reason about security
thoroughly enough. Please read the comments in `conf/example.gitolite.rc` for
details, looking for the word "security".
----
<a name="_contact_and_license"></a>
### contact and license
Gitolite is released under GPL v2. See COPYING for details.
* author: sitaramc@gmail.com, sitaram@atc.tcs.com
* mailing list: gitolite@googlegroups.com
* list subscribe address : gitolite+subscribe@googlegroups.com
[transcript]: http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite/doc/install-transcript.html
[install]: http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite/doc/1-INSTALL.html
[admin]: http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite/doc/2-admin.html
[migr]: http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite/doc/migrate.html
[doc9gas]: http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite/doc/gitolite-and-ssh.html
[doc6sts]: http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite/doc/ssh-troubleshooting.html
[who]: http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite/doc/who-uses-it.html
[tut]: http://sites.google.com/site/senawario/home/gitolite-tutorial
[docs]: http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite
[user]: http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite/doc/user-manual.html