Commit graph

409 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sitaram Chamarty 38337551b1 (minor) helpful message when git isn't found in PATH on server 2010-04-20 21:21:42 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 2cc8d0ba9a Merge branch 'master' into pu 2010-04-20 19:49:44 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 1e06fea3b6 (security) a different fix in place of 5fd9328
SECURITY NOTE: if you deleted or renamed a pubkey file after 5fd9328
went in (April 12th), please:

  - upgrade asap, then
  - go to your latest gitolite-admin clone and "git push -f"

Otherwise this is not urgent.

5fd9328 (and its minor successor 813a2a9) were about preventing the
gitolite admin from sneaking in files to src/ and hooks/ into
$GL_ADMINDIR.  It seemed easy enough to do this by converting the
path-less checkout to a with-paths checkout, but this has caused a worse
problem -- deleting a keydir/foo.pub now no longer has an effect; the
file still hangs around in the work tree.

Ouch!  (and thanks to teukka for noticing)

We now do this check as a separate step, so the checkout can revert to
being path-less.
2010-04-20 19:46:27 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 45ecc518f0 WARNING: WE NOW REFUSE TO RUN IF GIT ON THE SERVER IS < 1.6.2
I just got tired of supporting old gits.  Sorry.  Had to happen sooner
or later.

I know you feel upset right now but later you'll thank me.
2010-04-19 21:57:47 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty fabeedf103 document the info and expand commands 2010-04-16 20:07:50 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 34aad34478 make "expand" also print version, like "info" does
(thanks to Ilari for catching this)
2010-04-16 19:23:18 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 9670447d69 Merge branch 'pu' of a95gl:gitolite into pu 2010-04-16 13:28:02 +05:30
Sebastian Schuberth 8b31956c32 Do not override the SSH port if standard port 22 is used
Always passing "-p 22" to ssh (or "-P 22" to scp) if no custom port is given on
the command line causes trouble when not using a host name but an SSH session
name (as defined in .ssh/config) which defines a non-standard port, because the
port given on the command line overrides that port.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com>
2010-04-16 13:22:49 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 8a4cccf236 doc/7 and doc/0: how to clear out a botched install 2010-04-16 06:34:45 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 2a776e56ad "D" must be combined with RW or RW+ (warning: minor backward compat breakage)
Having to specify "D" separately from RW or RW+ was cumbersome, and
although I don't actually use this feature, I can see the point.

One way to think of this is:

  - RW and RW+ were the only existing branch level rights
  - it doesnt make sense to have D rights without W (hence RW) rights
  - so we simply suffix a D to these if required.

Thus you can have RW, RW+, RWD, RW+D.

I hope the (hopefully few) of you who have started to use this feature
will convert your configs when you next upgrade to "pu".

I now regret pushing the previous syntax to master too quickly -- lots
of people use master only, and on the next promotion of pu the syntax
will change.  To reduce this exposure, this change will be promoted to
master very soon.
2010-04-15 06:37:35 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 461a581322 (minor) document what to do when you have *two* gits
...and the wrong one ends up runing
2010-04-14 23:19:20 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 8d55bd722c (minor fixup) 2010-04-14 09:49:09 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 0f6079c7a6 added gerrit comparision 2010-04-14 06:58:39 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 9df775413c document the change in a982446
(thanks to Eli for catching this!)
2010-04-13 23:17:04 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 850e583ac7 changelog for v1.4 2010-04-13 18:35:33 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 344fb0a2b7 allow user to define filenames that our hooks chain to
(although the defaults are still update.secondary and
post-update.secondary if you don't do anything)
2010-04-13 18:26:34 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 9b35f84f55 fix bug in 7bfb367 that causes "@all.git" to be created! 2010-04-13 10:07:59 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 813a2a9908 (ls-tree has --name-only now!)
thanks to Teukka for pointing it out
2010-04-12 23:46:29 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 5fd9328c1c "accidental [mis]feature" -- yet another admin->shell hole blocked!
This is a pretty big hole, really.  Only the fact that Eli called it an
"accidental feature" helped catch it :)

Notes on the code:

An explicit list of paths -- maybe just "conf", "keydir", and "local" --
would have been easier, but this isn't too bad, I think.
2010-04-12 21:10:56 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 55e754a09f added notes on how to do more things via admin push 2010-04-12 21:10:52 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 4b65cc51d3 document how to create multiple gitolite instances on one server...
...and provide a pointer from the delegations doc for people taking
delegation too far ;-)
2010-04-11 04:09:50 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty e0fe73ac18 compile: recurse through keydir/ for pubkeys 2010-04-10 09:05:50 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 67607760e5 bypass update hook if GL_BYPASS_UPDATE_HOOK is available in ENV
people with shell access should be allowed to bypass the update hook, to
allow them to clone locally and push.  You can now do this by setting an
env var that the ssh "front door" will never set, like so:

    GL_BYPASS_UPDATE_HOOK=1 git push

Note that this will NOT work for the gitolite-admin repo, because the
post-update hook on that one requires a bit more.  If you really want to
do that, try:

    GL_ADMINDIR=~/.gitolite GL_BINDIR=~/.gitolite/src GL_BYPASS_UPDATE_HOOK=1 git push

(assuming default values in ~/.gitolite.rc)
2010-04-10 02:00:51 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 246165537d new server-side program "gl-tool", subcommand "shell-add"
Previous implementations of "give shell access to some gitolite users"
feature were crap.  There was no easy/elegant way to ensure that someone
who had repo admin access would not manage to get himself shell access.

Giving someone shell access requires that you should have shell access
in the first place, so the simplest way is to enable it from the server
side only.

So now that we decided to do that, we may as well prepare for other,
future, commands by starting a server-side utility program with
sub-commands (the only current one being "shell-add")
2010-04-09 21:05:17 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 5deffee3cf security: gitolite admin can get shell access by using screwy pubkey name
example: keydir/sitaram@$(some-dangerous-command; echo hi).pub

(still won't get the reward; that is only if a non-admin user gets
privs!)
2010-04-09 16:48:46 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty e6ee5cdb30 4b7d144 should have touched this also 2010-03-31 14:42:41 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 5aba13cd80 allow 'D' for @all repos
...so that the new semantics can be made system-default if someone wants
to do that
2010-03-31 06:45:29 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 967af2c993 compile/update: new "D" permission
normally, RW+ means permission to rewind or delete.

Now, if you use "D" permission anywhere in a repo config, that means
"delete" and RW+ then means only "rewind", no delete.
2010-03-30 23:28:26 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 33b886c512 we're getting a nice solaris workout after a long time :) 2010-03-30 19:37:22 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 72b63abaf2 auth, gitolite.pm: do not leak info about repo existence
All this is about a user trying to look if a repo exists or not, when he
does not have any access to that repo.  Ideally, "repo does not exist"
should be indistinguishable from "you dont have perms to that repo".

(1) if $GL_WILDREPOS is not set, you either get a permissions error, or
    a "$repo not found in compiled config" death.  Fixed.

(2) if $GL_WILDREPOS is set, you either get either a permissions error,
    or a "$repo has no matches" death.  Fixed.

(3) The following combination leaks info about repo existence:

      - actual repo doesn't exist
      - spying user don't have C perms
      - repo patt doesn't contain CREATER
      - RW+ = CREATER is specified (as is normal)

    In such case, the "convenience copy" of the ACL that parse_acl
    makes, coupled with substituting CREATER for the invoking user means
    $repos{$actual_repo} has RW+ for the spying user.  This means the
    access denied doesn't happen, and control passes to git, which
    promptly expresses it unhappiness and angst over being given a repo
    that 'does not appear to be a git repository'

    This doesn't happen if all those conditions are not met:

      - if repo exists, CREATER is set to the real creater, so RW+ =
        CREATER does not gain spying user anything
      - if spying user has C perms it just gets created, because he has
        rights.  This is also info leak but we can't prevent it; tighten
        the config (maybe by including CREATER in repo pattern) if this
        is not wanted
      - if repo patt contains CREATER it will never match someone else's
        repo anyway!
2010-03-29 21:18:39 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 6a44c564a2 doc/4: added "how it actually works" section
thanks to Ilari for helping fix a bug (see previous commit) and then
prompting this documentation
2010-03-28 12:30:43 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty a45d2d9912 auth: do not implicitly assign RW access for creaters
a configuration like this:

    repo CREATER/.*
        C       =   CREATER
        RW+     =   WRITERS

was buggy; CREATER was implicitly part of WRITERS so he got RW
permissions implicitly, so the push went through
2010-03-27 22:55:58 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 6e17c74abf silly little PATH bug...
what this means is that until now, everyone who used easy-install
(without needing to set $GIT_PATH in the rc file) had a client-side PATH
that was perfectly valid on the server side also!
2010-03-26 21:36:28 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 7bfb3676b7 @all for repos is now much cleaner; a true @all...
- no need to put it at the end of the config file now, yeaaay!
  - @all for @all is meaningless and not supported.  People asking will
    be told to get a life or use git-daemon.
  - NAME/ limits for @all repos is ignored for efficiency reasons.
2010-03-26 21:36:05 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty a3f1258a0a reduce a bit of code duplication in check_access; make it call check_ref 2010-03-23 14:59:33 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty b3c5d14421 relent a little and document the expand command a tiny bit :) 2010-03-20 09:59:07 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 364a2317c2 created gitolite@googlegroups.com, updated README
enough people told me they want one because they don't watch the git ML
or it's too high traffic, so I finally made one and invited a few folks.
2010-03-19 07:18:12 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty bad0723974 allow @all to be used as a "user" in setperms 2010-03-18 22:06:25 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty f282b8f926 gl-setup: dash-compat
before someone runs it on the new Ubuntu :)
2010-03-18 20:48:43 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty b537a4acd4 dash it all!
Ubuntu now defaults to /bin/sh -> /bin/dash, while my brain seems to
default to bash.

I guess it's easier to fix my brain, and my code <sigh>
2010-03-18 09:13:41 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty bfc9c7aeb5 minor fixup; spurious error killed 2010-03-17 20:43:20 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty e91e8c80d9 minor oopsie in post-update hook chaining 2010-03-17 20:37:41 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 412a691810 compile: remove the sortsub for data dumper
Data dumper was failing (returning an empty string!) on an input config
file of about 350 lines or so (output 2400 lines or so).

Removing the sort sub fixed the problem.

To recap why that sub was put in (see deleted lines in this commit for
details), what we really want is that $creater must appear *last* in the
resulting dump.

So we trick it.  "man ascii" tells you that ~ is the highest valued
ASCII character (yes, I know, not utf-8 safe etc... I'll deal with that
if and when needed or punt!).  So we just put that in front of $creater
and remove it later...

You *don't* want to do this for $readers and $writers -- then they will
once again sort *after* $creater, which would be a bad thing.  Also,
it's probably better this way, because now the order of the hash keys
will be: $readers, $writers, any actual users listed, and then $creater.

This means the effective access rights will be:

1.  if you are the creater you get CREATER's rights
2.  else if your userid is listed *explicitly* in the config, you get
    those rights
3.  else if you've been setperm'd as a writer, you get WRITERS rights
4.  else if you've been setperm'd as a reader, you get READERS rights

This is different from what used to happen till now; READERS and WRITERS
used to trump explicitly given rights.  I'd been meaning to fix that
somehow, but never got around to it, until this DDD (damn Data Dumper!)
forced my hand :)
2010-03-17 19:30:14 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 05431233a2 post-update hook now chains to post-update.secondary
undocumented but analogous to the documented update hook chaining
2010-03-16 19:27:29 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 33d6856f4b update: disallow old-style personal branches
The downside is that the repo config does need to be edited and new
style line(s) added.
2010-03-16 18:27:26 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 2456cc17c8 personal branches: de-emphasise old-style, document new-style
There are some disadvantages to the old-style personal branch scheme.
It only allows one specific pattern (of refname) to be used, forces that
pattern to be applicable to *all* repos in the entire config, and
requires editing the rc file (on the server) to be edited to achieve
this.

In other words, it's a very blunt instrument...

The new style depends on using lines like this within a specific repo
config:

        RW+ personal/USER/      =   @userlist

The important thing is that the "branch" name should contain `/USER/`
(including the slashes).  Access is still determined by the right hand
side of course.

This gives you the following advantages:

  - allow it only for repos that need it
  - allow different patterns to be used for different repos
  - allow *multiple* patterns; just add more than one such line
  - allow the pattern to have suffixes (eg: foo/USER/bar)
2010-03-16 18:27:26 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 83884aa758 compile/update hook: enable new style personal branches
The new style personal branches work by interpreting the special
sequence /USER/ (including the slashes) in a refname.  Docs should be in
the next commit...
2010-03-16 18:27:22 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty ed5c78349e update hook now allows chaining to "update.secondary"
the changes to cp/scp are because without "-p" they dont carry perms
across to existing files.  So if you forgot to chmod +x your custom
hook and ran easy install, then after that you have to go to the server
side to fix the perms...
2010-03-14 22:48:25 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty bf7aba7e0b changelog 2010-03-12 17:20:12 +05:30
Sitaram Chamarty 367e8f8932 minor LFCR -> CRLF fix 2010-03-12 11:08:51 +05:30