+ Patch from Sean Cashin that fixes filter behaviour

Filters would not accept apostrophes, now they do.
Thanks Sean Cashin (http://github.com/scashin133)!
master
Kaspar Schiess 2010-10-08 16:41:02 +02:00
parent 7143490850
commit cd866c0109
2 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ class Net::LDAP::Filter
scanner.scan(/\s*/)
if op = scanner.scan(/<=|>=|!=|:=|=/)
scanner.scan(/\s*/)
if value = scanner.scan(/(?:[-\w*.+@=,#\$%&!\s]|\\[a-fA-F\d]{2})+/)
if value = scanner.scan(/(?:[-\w*.+@=,#\$%&!'\s]|\\[a-fA-F\d]{2})+/)
# 20100313 AZ: Assumes that "(uid=george*)" is the same as
# "(uid=george* )". The standard doesn't specify, but I can find
# no examples that suggest otherwise.

View File

@ -44,5 +44,10 @@ describe Net::LDAP::Filter do
end
end
end
describe "<- .construct" do
it "should accept apostrophes in filters (regression)" do
Net::LDAP::Filter.construct("uid=O'Keefe").to_rfc2254.should == "(uid=O'Keefe)"
end
end
end