Merge pull request #34 from jessehub/master
salted sha1 for password generator()
This commit is contained in:
commit
9de9bc755b
1 changed files with 20 additions and 14 deletions
|
@ -1,31 +1,37 @@
|
|||
# -*- ruby encoding: utf-8 -*-
|
||||
require 'digest/sha1'
|
||||
require 'digest/md5'
|
||||
require 'base64'
|
||||
|
||||
class Net::LDAP::Password
|
||||
class << self
|
||||
# Generate a password-hash suitable for inclusion in an LDAP attribute.
|
||||
# Pass a hash type (currently supported: :md5 and :sha) and a plaintext
|
||||
# Pass a hash type as a symbol (:md5, :sha, :ssha) and a plaintext
|
||||
# password. This function will return a hashed representation.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#--
|
||||
# STUB: This is here to fulfill the requirements of an RFC, which
|
||||
# one?
|
||||
#
|
||||
# TODO, gotta do salted-sha and (maybe)salted-md5. Should we provide
|
||||
# sha1 as a synonym for sha1? I vote no because then should you also
|
||||
# provide ssha1 for symmetry?
|
||||
# TODO:
|
||||
# * maybe salted-md5
|
||||
# * Should we provide sha1 as a synonym for sha1? I vote no because then
|
||||
# should you also provide ssha1 for symmetry?
|
||||
#
|
||||
attribute_value = ""
|
||||
def generate(type, str)
|
||||
digest, digest_name = case type
|
||||
case type
|
||||
when :md5
|
||||
[Digest::MD5.new, 'MD5']
|
||||
attribute_value = '{MD5}' + Base64.encode64(Digest::MD5.digest(str)).chomp!
|
||||
when :sha
|
||||
[Digest::SHA1.new, 'SHA']
|
||||
attribute_value = '{SHA}' + Base64.encode64(Digest::SHA1.digest(str)).chomp!
|
||||
when :ssha
|
||||
srand; salt = (rand * 1000).to_i.to_s
|
||||
attribute_value = '{SSHA}' + Base64.encode64(Digest::SHA1.digest(str + salt) + salt).chomp!
|
||||
else
|
||||
raise Net::LDAP::LdapError, "Unsupported password-hash type (#{type})"
|
||||
end
|
||||
digest << str.to_s
|
||||
return "{#{digest_name}}#{[digest.digest].pack('m').chomp }"
|
||||
return attribute_value
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue