this receive seems to work well.
It has checksum errors at 123 byte payloads, but this was tested with the old rftest-tx --- so the transmit side could be the problem.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f5391e88dc
commit
e8550f26ba
3 changed files with 14 additions and 11 deletions
|
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ struct packet {
|
|||
uint8_t length;
|
||||
volatile struct packet * left;
|
||||
volatile struct packet * right;
|
||||
uint8_t data[MAX_PACKET_SIZE];
|
||||
uint8_t data[MAX_PACKET_SIZE+1]; /* + 1 since maca returns the length as the first byte */
|
||||
};
|
||||
typedef struct packet packet_t;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
10
lib/maca.c
10
lib/maca.c
|
@ -14,16 +14,16 @@
|
|||
#define NUM_PACKETS 8
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef RECV_SOFTIMEOUT
|
||||
#define RECV_SOFTIMEOUT 4096 /* about 3.5 128 byte packets */
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* for 250kHz clock */
|
||||
#define MACA_CLOCK_DIV 95
|
||||
/* (32 chips/sym) * (sym/4bits) * (8bits/byte) = (64 chips/byte) */
|
||||
/* (8 chips/clk) * (byte/64 chips) = byte/8clks */
|
||||
#define CLK_PER_BYTE 8
|
||||
|
||||
#define MACA_CLOCK_DIV 95
|
||||
#ifndef RECV_SOFTIMEOUT
|
||||
#define RECV_SOFTIMEOUT 4*128*CLK_PER_BYTE /* 4 128 byte packets */
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#define reg(x) (*(volatile uint32_t *)(x))
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
13
tests/per.c
13
tests/per.c
|
@ -70,15 +70,18 @@ void session_req(short_addr_t addr) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void print_packet(packet_t *p) {
|
||||
volatile uint8_t i,j;
|
||||
volatile uint8_t i,j,k;
|
||||
#define PER_ROW 16
|
||||
if(p) {
|
||||
printf("len 0x%02x:",p->length);
|
||||
for(j=0; j < ((p->length)%16)-1; j++) {
|
||||
for(i=0; i<p->length; i++) {
|
||||
printf("%02x ",p->data[j*16+i]);
|
||||
printf("len 0x%02x\n\r",p->length);
|
||||
for(j=0, k=0; j < ((p->length)%PER_ROW)-1; j++) {
|
||||
for(i=0; i < PER_ROW; i++, k++) {
|
||||
if(k>=p->length) { break; }
|
||||
printf("%02x ",p->data[j*PER_ROW+i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
printf("\n\r");
|
||||
}
|
||||
printf("\n\r");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue