cc253x: Renamed the P2 ISR
This is mainly a naming convention thing, we want to have 'isr' as part of the name, instead of 'int'. We also want port_2 instead of p2 because we already had port_1 See Pull Request #18
This commit is contained in:
parent
fea4970142
commit
d9d4fa168d
|
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|||
static struct cc253x_p2_handler *handlers = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
cc253x_p2_int(void) __interrupt(P2INT_VECTOR)
|
||||
port_2_isr(void) __interrupt(P2INT_VECTOR)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cc253x_p2_handler *h;
|
||||
uint8_t handled = 0;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ void cc253x_p2_unregister_handler(struct cc253x_p2_handler *h);
|
|||
/* When the ISR is not needed, hide its prototype from the module containing
|
||||
* main() to prevent linking it */
|
||||
#if PORT_2_ISR_ENABLED
|
||||
void cc253x_p2_int(void) __interrupt(P2INT_VECTOR);
|
||||
void port_2_isr(void) __interrupt(P2INT_VECTOR);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#define cc253x_p2_irq_disable(flag) do { flag = IEN2 & 0x2; IEN2 &= ~0x2; } while(0)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue