From b9fc6a8324637469850be4c89aa14435c05d17d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Schlatterbeck <rsc@runtux.com>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 16:44:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix for hardware with less gpio pins

Some implementations don't have enough pins to implement CC2520_FIFO on a
separate pin. By not defining CC2520_FIFO_IS_1 an alternative
implementation uses an spi command to retrieve the FIFO overflow
exception info.
---
 dev/cc2520/cc2520.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/dev/cc2520/cc2520.c b/dev/cc2520/cc2520.c
index e0dad1b6a..37f5f128e 100644
--- a/dev/cc2520/cc2520.c
+++ b/dev/cc2520/cc2520.c
@@ -752,7 +752,17 @@ cc2520_read(void *buf, unsigned short bufsize)
   }
 
   if(CC2520_FIFOP_IS_1) {
+/* Some implementations don't have enough pins for CC2520_FIFO_IS_1
+ * So if this is not defined we need to explicitly check for RX FIFO
+ * overflow, this is bit 6 in EXCFLAG0, see p.112 of spec.
+ */
+#ifdef CC2520_FIFO_IS_1
     if(!CC2520_FIFO_IS_1) {
+#else
+    uint8_t data;
+    CC2520_READ_REG(CC2520_EXCFLAG0,data);
+    if(data & BV(6)) {
+#endif
       /* Clean up in case of FIFO overflow!  This happens for every
        * full length frame and is signaled by FIFOP = 1 and FIFO =
        * 0. */