Fix RF230 transition: RX_AACK_ON -> TX_ARET_ON (go through PLL_ON,
as per datasheet). Tested on RF230 and 128RFA1 (RF231).
This commit is contained in:
parent
1bb055bae6
commit
5636357243
1 changed files with 7 additions and 11 deletions
|
@ -443,19 +443,15 @@ radio_set_trx_state(uint8_t new_state)
|
|||
radio_reset_state_machine(); /* Go to TRX_OFF from any state. */
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* It is not allowed to go from RX_AACK_ON or TX_AACK_ON and directly to */
|
||||
/* TX_AACK_ON or RX_AACK_ON respectively. Need to go via RX_ON or PLL_ON. */
|
||||
if ((new_state == TX_ARET_ON) &&
|
||||
(original_state == RX_AACK_ON)){
|
||||
/* First do intermediate state transition to PLL_ON, then to TX_ARET_ON. */
|
||||
/* The final state transition to TX_ARET_ON is handled after the if-else if. */
|
||||
/* TX_AACK_ON or RX_AACK_ON respectively. Need to go via PLL_ON. */
|
||||
/* (Old datasheets allowed other transitions, but this code complies with */
|
||||
/* the current specification for RF230, RF231 and 128RFA1.) */
|
||||
if (((new_state == TX_ARET_ON) && (original_state == RX_AACK_ON)) ||
|
||||
((new_state == RX_AACK_ON) && (original_state == TX_ARET_ON))){
|
||||
/* First do intermediate state transition to PLL_ON. */
|
||||
/* The final state transition is handled after the if-else if. */
|
||||
hal_subregister_write(SR_TRX_CMD, PLL_ON);
|
||||
delay_us(TIME_STATE_TRANSITION_PLL_ACTIVE);
|
||||
} else if ((new_state == RX_AACK_ON) &&
|
||||
(original_state == TX_ARET_ON)){
|
||||
/* First do intermediate state transition to RX_ON, then to RX_AACK_ON. */
|
||||
/* The final state transition to RX_AACK_ON is handled after the if-else if. */
|
||||
hal_subregister_write(SR_TRX_CMD, RX_ON);
|
||||
delay_us(TIME_STATE_TRANSITION_PLL_ACTIVE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Any other state transition can be done directly. */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue