instiki/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/transactions.rb
Jacques Distler 4e14ccc74d Instiki 0.16.3: Rails 2.3.0
Instiki now runs on the Rails 2.3.0 Candidate Release.
Among other improvements, this means that it now 
automagically selects between WEBrick and Mongrel.

Just run

    ./instiki --daemon
2009-02-04 14:26:08 -06:00

236 lines
9.4 KiB
Ruby

require 'thread'
module ActiveRecord
# See ActiveRecord::Transactions::ClassMethods for documentation.
module Transactions
class TransactionError < ActiveRecordError # :nodoc:
end
def self.included(base)
base.extend(ClassMethods)
base.class_eval do
[:destroy, :save, :save!].each do |method|
alias_method_chain method, :transactions
end
end
end
# Transactions are protective blocks where SQL statements are only permanent
# if they can all succeed as one atomic action. The classic example is a
# transfer between two accounts where you can only have a deposit if the
# withdrawal succeeded and vice versa. Transactions enforce the integrity of
# the database and guard the data against program errors or database
# break-downs. So basically you should use transaction blocks whenever you
# have a number of statements that must be executed together or not at all.
# Example:
#
# ActiveRecord::Base.transaction do
# david.withdrawal(100)
# mary.deposit(100)
# end
#
# This example will only take money from David and give to Mary if neither
# +withdrawal+ nor +deposit+ raises an exception. Exceptions will force a
# ROLLBACK that returns the database to the state before the transaction was
# begun. Be aware, though, that the objects will _not_ have their instance
# data returned to their pre-transactional state.
#
# == Different Active Record classes in a single transaction
#
# Though the transaction class method is called on some Active Record class,
# the objects within the transaction block need not all be instances of
# that class. This is because transactions are per-database connection, not
# per-model.
#
# In this example a <tt>Balance</tt> record is transactionally saved even
# though <tt>transaction</tt> is called on the <tt>Account</tt> class:
#
# Account.transaction do
# balance.save!
# account.save!
# end
#
# Note that the +transaction+ method is also available as a model instance
# method. For example, you can also do this:
#
# balance.transaction do
# balance.save!
# account.save!
# end
#
# == Transactions are not distributed across database connections
#
# A transaction acts on a single database connection. If you have
# multiple class-specific databases, the transaction will not protect
# interaction among them. One workaround is to begin a transaction
# on each class whose models you alter:
#
# Student.transaction do
# Course.transaction do
# course.enroll(student)
# student.units += course.units
# end
# end
#
# This is a poor solution, but full distributed transactions are beyond
# the scope of Active Record.
#
# == Save and destroy are automatically wrapped in a transaction
#
# Both Base#save and Base#destroy come wrapped in a transaction that ensures
# that whatever you do in validations or callbacks will happen under the
# protected cover of a transaction. So you can use validations to check for
# values that the transaction depends on or you can raise exceptions in the
# callbacks to rollback, including <tt>after_*</tt> callbacks.
#
# == Exception handling and rolling back
#
# Also have in mind that exceptions thrown within a transaction block will
# be propagated (after triggering the ROLLBACK), so you should be ready to
# catch those in your application code.
#
# One exception is the ActiveRecord::Rollback exception, which will trigger
# a ROLLBACK when raised, but not be re-raised by the transaction block.
#
# *Warning*: one should not catch ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid exceptions
# inside a transaction block. StatementInvalid exceptions indicate that an
# error occurred at the database level, for example when a unique constraint
# is violated. On some database systems, such as PostgreSQL, database errors
# inside a transaction causes the entire transaction to become unusable
# until it's restarted from the beginning. Here is an example which
# demonstrates the problem:
#
# # Suppose that we have a Number model with a unique column called 'i'.
# Number.transaction do
# Number.create(:i => 0)
# begin
# # This will raise a unique constraint error...
# Number.create(:i => 0)
# rescue ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid
# # ...which we ignore.
# end
#
# # On PostgreSQL, the transaction is now unusable. The following
# # statement will cause a PostgreSQL error, even though the unique
# # constraint is no longer violated:
# Number.create(:i => 1)
# # => "PGError: ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands
# # ignored until end of transaction block"
# end
#
# One should restart the entire transaction if a StatementError occurred.
#
# == Nested transactions
#
# #transaction calls can be nested. By default, this makes all database
# statements in the nested transaction block become part of the parent
# transaction. For example:
#
# User.transaction do
# User.create(:username => 'Kotori')
# User.transaction do
# User.create(:username => 'Nemu')
# raise ActiveRecord::Rollback
# end
# end
#
# User.find(:all) # => empty
#
# It is also possible to requires a sub-transaction by passing
# <tt>:requires_new => true</tt>. If anything goes wrong, the
# database rolls back to the beginning of the sub-transaction
# without rolling back the parent transaction. For example:
#
# User.transaction do
# User.create(:username => 'Kotori')
# User.transaction(:requires_new => true) do
# User.create(:username => 'Nemu')
# raise ActiveRecord::Rollback
# end
# end
#
# User.find(:all) # => Returns only Kotori
#
# Most databases don't support true nested transactions. At the time of
# writing, the only database that we're aware of that supports true nested
# transactions, is MS-SQL. Because of this, Active Record emulates nested
# transactions by using savepoints. See
# http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/savepoints.html
# for more information about savepoints.
#
# === Caveats
#
# If you're on MySQL, then do not use DDL operations in nested transactions
# blocks that are emulated with savepoints. That is, do not execute statements
# like 'CREATE TABLE' inside such blocks. This is because MySQL automatically
# releases all savepoints upon executing a DDL operation. When #transaction
# is finished and tries to release the savepoint it created earlier, a
# database error will occur because the savepoint has already been
# automatically released. The following example demonstrates the problem:
#
# Model.connection.transaction do # BEGIN
# Model.connection.transaction(:requires_new => true) do # CREATE SAVEPOINT active_record_1
# Model.connection.create_table(...) # active_record_1 now automatically released
# end # RELEASE savepoint active_record_1
# # ^^^^ BOOM! database error!
# end
module ClassMethods
# See ActiveRecord::Transactions::ClassMethods for detailed documentation.
def transaction(options = {}, &block)
# See the ConnectionAdapters::DatabaseStatements#transaction API docs.
connection.transaction(options, &block)
end
end
# See ActiveRecord::Transactions::ClassMethods for detailed documentation.
def transaction(&block)
self.class.transaction(&block)
end
def destroy_with_transactions #:nodoc:
with_transaction_returning_status(:destroy_without_transactions)
end
def save_with_transactions(perform_validation = true) #:nodoc:
rollback_active_record_state! { with_transaction_returning_status(:save_without_transactions, perform_validation) }
end
def save_with_transactions! #:nodoc:
rollback_active_record_state! { self.class.transaction { save_without_transactions! } }
end
# Reset id and @new_record if the transaction rolls back.
def rollback_active_record_state!
id_present = has_attribute?(self.class.primary_key)
previous_id = id
previous_new_record = new_record?
yield
rescue Exception
@new_record = previous_new_record
if id_present
self.id = previous_id
else
@attributes.delete(self.class.primary_key)
@attributes_cache.delete(self.class.primary_key)
end
raise
end
# Executes +method+ within a transaction and captures its return value as a
# status flag. If the status is true the transaction is committed, otherwise
# a ROLLBACK is issued. In any case the status flag is returned.
#
# This method is available within the context of an ActiveRecord::Base
# instance.
def with_transaction_returning_status(method, *args)
status = nil
self.class.transaction do
status = send(method, *args)
raise ActiveRecord::Rollback unless status
end
status
end
end
end