NOTE: there are no *functional* changes in this for *normal*
gitolite users. It's just a chunk of code moving into a new
subroutine etc.
KDE needs to populate the authkeys file from an LDAP store. Other large
projects may have similar means to store keys, depending on how they do
their user provisioning so a generic solution is worth exploring.
This means that in these special cases
- the gitolite-admin repo's keydir/ directory is not needed [1]
- but they still need to create the authkeys file somehow
Implementation:
- write a shim program to make the authkeys-generation code callable
from the command line/shell.
- set $GL_NO_SETUP_AUTHKEYS=1 in the rc file to disable authkey
generation during a "compile" (admin repo push)
Expected usage of new program gl-setup-authkeys:
- LDAP change triggers some script
- this script collects all keys from LDAP, puts them in some
directory, and then calls gl-setup-authkeys, passing it the name of
the directory
ALSO PLEASE SEE COMMENTS AT THE TOP OF THE NEW PROGRAM IN THIS COMMIT
FOR SOME IMPORTANT DISCUSSION.
----
Footnotes:
[1] It doesn't make sense to use it if the keys will be maintained by
some other entity and can be called up as needed, and it adds an
unnecessary extra step.
"WARNING: a pubkey file can only have one line (key); ignoring $pubkey"
message was a bit confusing, because elsewhere the docs claim multiple
keys are suported. Added note on how to add multiple keys for single
user and pointer to the doc file concerned.
This is what I *should* have done back then; thanks to Jeff Mitchell for
pointing out a problem with the old method.
The old one is *definitely* a kludge. <shamefaced grin>
The main use case is for people who give most people access via @all,
which is somewhat unusual but in some situations it probably makes
sense.
See also a related commit made a month or so ago (aa8da93).
Actually these two lint checks were made to help people spot typos in
the config, which sorta becomes meaningless if you have more than a few
such cases anyway, so for most people it should not matter that I am now
merely summarising the number of such cases if there are more then 10.
the commits leading up to v1.5 caused the data format to change (we
added a rule sequence number).
This in turn caused a problem for people who may have installed using
the "system install / user setup" mode of install (which includes people
who used RPM/DEB to install it) -- they would now have to *manually* run
"gl-setup" once after the rpm/deb upgrade.
This commit *tries* to mitigate this problem by recording a data format
version number in the compiled output file. On any access to that file,
if the version number is not found or is found to be not equal to the
current version, gl-setup is run again.
The reason I say "*tries*" is that the exact command used to do this is
a bit of a hack for now. However, if it works for Fedora and Debian,
I'm going to leave it at that :)
There were 2 problems with rule sequencing.
Eli had a use case where everyone is equal, but some are more equal than
the others ;-) He wanted a way to say "everyone can create repos under
their own names, but only some people should be able to rewind their
branches".
Something like this would be ideal (follow the rules in sequence for
u1/u2/u3/u4, and you will see that the "deny" rule kicks in to prevent
u1/u2 from being able to rewind, although they can certainly delete
their branches):
@private-owners = u1 u2
@experienced-private-owners = u3 u4
repo CREATOR/.*
C = @private-owners @experienced-private-owners
RWD = CREATOR
RW = WRITERS
R = READERS
- = @private-owners
RW+D = CREATOR
In normal gitolite this doesn't work because the CREATOR rules (which
get translated to "u1" at runtime) end up over-writing the "deny" rule
when u1 or u2 are the creators. This over-writing happens directly at
the "do compiled.pm" step.
With big-config, this does not happen (because @private-owners does not
get expanded to u1 and u2), but the problem remains: the order of
picking up elements of repo_plus and user_plus is such that, again, the
RW+D wins (it appears before the "-" rule).
We fix all that by
- making CREATOR complete to more than just the creator's name (for
"u1", it now becomes "u1 - wild", which is actually illegal to use
for real so there's no possibility of a name clash!)
- maintaining a rule sequence number that is used to sort the rules
eventually applied (this also resulted in the refex+perm hash
becoming a list)
Since it is possible to do all sorts of shenanigans with wildcards and
repo groups, we
- allow only a fragment called "foo" to set permissions for a group
called "@foo", in addition to a repo called "foo"
- forbid defining any groups within a fragment conf. All "@foo = bar
baz" must be done in the main config file now.
If this proves too limiting for anyone I'll worry about it then.
If you have many thousands of repos and users, neatly organised into
groups, etc., the normal gitolite fails. (It actually runs out of
memory very fast while doing the "compile" when you push the config, due
to the number of combinations of repo/user being stored in the hash!)
This commit series will stop doing that if you set $GL_BIG_CONFIG = 1 in
the rc file.
Some notes:
- deny rules will still work but somewhat differently -- now they must
be placed all together in one place to work like before. Ask me for
details if you need to know before I get done with the docs
- I've tested most of the important features, but not every single
nuance
- the update hook may be a tad less efficient now; we can try and
tweak it later if needed but it shouldn't really hurt anything
significantly even now
- docs have not been written yet
Ouch! How mortifying :) I'd always thought this was one of the Brit/US
differences, but to find out that it really *isn't* a word... hmph!
Anyway, in the interest of not breaking existing wild repos, the
ownership file is still called "gl-creater". Everything else has been
changed.
(...thanks to Sverre)
Having to specify "D" separately from RW or RW+ was cumbersome, and
although I don't actually use this feature, I can see the point.
One way to think of this is:
- RW and RW+ were the only existing branch level rights
- it doesnt make sense to have D rights without W (hence RW) rights
- so we simply suffix a D to these if required.
Thus you can have RW, RW+, RWD, RW+D.
I hope the (hopefully few) of you who have started to use this feature
will convert your configs when you next upgrade to "pu".
I now regret pushing the previous syntax to master too quickly -- lots
of people use master only, and on the next promotion of pu the syntax
will change. To reduce this exposure, this change will be promoted to
master very soon.
Previous implementations of "give shell access to some gitolite users"
feature were crap. There was no easy/elegant way to ensure that someone
who had repo admin access would not manage to get himself shell access.
Giving someone shell access requires that you should have shell access
in the first place, so the simplest way is to enable it from the server
side only.
So now that we decided to do that, we may as well prepare for other,
future, commands by starting a server-side utility program with
sub-commands (the only current one being "shell-add")
normally, RW+ means permission to rewind or delete.
Now, if you use "D" permission anywhere in a repo config, that means
"delete" and RW+ then means only "rewind", no delete.
- no need to put it at the end of the config file now, yeaaay!
- @all for @all is meaningless and not supported. People asking will
be told to get a life or use git-daemon.
- NAME/ limits for @all repos is ignored for efficiency reasons.
Data dumper was failing (returning an empty string!) on an input config
file of about 350 lines or so (output 2400 lines or so).
Removing the sort sub fixed the problem.
To recap why that sub was put in (see deleted lines in this commit for
details), what we really want is that $creater must appear *last* in the
resulting dump.
So we trick it. "man ascii" tells you that ~ is the highest valued
ASCII character (yes, I know, not utf-8 safe etc... I'll deal with that
if and when needed or punt!). So we just put that in front of $creater
and remove it later...
You *don't* want to do this for $readers and $writers -- then they will
once again sort *after* $creater, which would be a bad thing. Also,
it's probably better this way, because now the order of the hash keys
will be: $readers, $writers, any actual users listed, and then $creater.
This means the effective access rights will be:
1. if you are the creater you get CREATER's rights
2. else if your userid is listed *explicitly* in the config, you get
those rights
3. else if you've been setperm'd as a writer, you get WRITERS rights
4. else if you've been setperm'd as a reader, you get READERS rights
This is different from what used to happen till now; READERS and WRITERS
used to trump explicitly given rights. I'd been meaning to fix that
somehow, but never got around to it, until this DDD (damn Data Dumper!)
forced my hand :)
The new style personal branches work by interpreting the special
sequence /USER/ (including the slashes) in a refname. Docs should be in
the next commit...
when repos are copied over from elsewhere, one had to run easy install
once again to make the new (OS-copied) repo contain the proper update
hook.
We eliminate this step now, using a new, empty, "hook" as a sentinel and
having "compile" check/fix all repos' hooks.
Since you have to add the repos to conf anyway, this makes it as
seamless as possible. The correct sequence now is
- (server) copy the repo at the OS level
- (admin clone) add it to conf/gitolite.conf, commit, push
let expand_list be just that "expand a list", and leave checking to be
done outside.
otherwise, commit 690604d79 has the side effect of restricting refs to
$REPOPATT_PATT, and so for instance barfing on the perfectly valid
RW+ refs/(?!heads/master) = alice bob
(thanks to Teemu for catching this)
this came up in some other discussion with bremner. As usual I said no
I won't do it because I don't see any real need.
...then I realised it's just one line :)
Gitolite allows you to set git repo options using the "config" keyword;
see conf/example.conf for details and syntax.
However, if you are in an installation where the repo admin does not
(and should not) have shell access to the server, then allowing him to
set arbitrary repo config options *may* be a security risk -- some
config settings may allow executing arbitrary commands.
This patch fixes it, introducing a new RC variable to control the
behaviour. See conf/example.gitolite.rc for details
The wildrepos branch has been merged into master, and deleted. It will no
longer exist as a separate branch. Instead, a new variable
called $GL_WILDREPOS has been added which acts as a switch; when
off (which is the default), many wildrepos features are disabled.
(the "C" permissions, and the getperms (etc.) commands mainly).
Important: if you are using wildrepos, please set "$GL_WILDREPOS = 1;" in
the RC file when you upgrade to this version (or just before you do the
upgrade).
lots of conflicts, esp in gl-auth-command, due to refactoring the
"special commands" stuff on master
Conflicts:
doc/3-faq-tips-etc.mkd
src/gitolite.pm
src/gl-auth-command
src/gl-compile-conf
Gitolite uses projects.list to set the owners for gitweb's use.
Unfortunately, this does not work for gitweb setups that set
$projectroot to a directory, thus generating the list of
repositories on the fly.
This patch changes that: gitolite now writes the gitweb.owner
configuration variable for each repository (and properly cleans up after
itself if the owner is removed).
The patch causes gitolite not to write the owner to projects.list
anymore, as this would be redundant.
The owner also needs no longer be escaped, so this patch removes the
poor man's 's/ /+/g' escaping previously in place.
Note that I am not a Perl coder. Thus there are probably better ways to
implement this, but at least it works.
Cc: Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: martin f. krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
This is actually a pretty big deal, and I am seriously starting wonder
if calling this "gito*lite*" is justified anymore.
Anyway, in for a penny, in for a pound...
This patch implements a generic way to allow access control for external
commands, as long as they are invoked via ssh and present a server-side
command that contains enough information to make an access control
decision.
The first (and only, so far) such command implemented is rsync.
Please read the changes in this commit (at least the ones in conf/ and
doc/) carefully.
