Data dumper was failing (returning an empty string!) on an input config
file of about 350 lines or so (output 2400 lines or so).
Removing the sort sub fixed the problem.
To recap why that sub was put in (see deleted lines in this commit for
details), what we really want is that $creater must appear *last* in the
resulting dump.
So we trick it. "man ascii" tells you that ~ is the highest valued
ASCII character (yes, I know, not utf-8 safe etc... I'll deal with that
if and when needed or punt!). So we just put that in front of $creater
and remove it later...
You *don't* want to do this for $readers and $writers -- then they will
once again sort *after* $creater, which would be a bad thing. Also,
it's probably better this way, because now the order of the hash keys
will be: $readers, $writers, any actual users listed, and then $creater.
This means the effective access rights will be:
1. if you are the creater you get CREATER's rights
2. else if your userid is listed *explicitly* in the config, you get
those rights
3. else if you've been setperm'd as a writer, you get WRITERS rights
4. else if you've been setperm'd as a reader, you get READERS rights
This is different from what used to happen till now; READERS and WRITERS
used to trump explicitly given rights. I'd been meaning to fix that
somehow, but never got around to it, until this DDD (damn Data Dumper!)
forced my hand :)
There are some disadvantages to the old-style personal branch scheme.
It only allows one specific pattern (of refname) to be used, forces that
pattern to be applicable to *all* repos in the entire config, and
requires editing the rc file (on the server) to be edited to achieve
this.
In other words, it's a very blunt instrument...
The new style depends on using lines like this within a specific repo
config:
RW+ personal/USER/ = @userlist
The important thing is that the "branch" name should contain `/USER/`
(including the slashes). Access is still determined by the right hand
side of course.
This gives you the following advantages:
- allow it only for repos that need it
- allow different patterns to be used for different repos
- allow *multiple* patterns; just add more than one such line
- allow the pattern to have suffixes (eg: foo/USER/bar)
The new style personal branches work by interpreting the special
sequence /USER/ (including the slashes) in a refname. Docs should be in
the next commit...
the changes to cp/scp are because without "-p" they dont carry perms
across to existing files. So if you forgot to chmod +x your custom
hook and ran easy install, then after that you have to go to the server
side to fix the perms...
I've been unwilling to create the authkeys file if it does not already
exist, because it represents a significant change in accessibility for
that account.
However, in the "distro package" scenario, one wants to make it as easy
as possible for the end-user (who is actually an admin for the gitolite
being hosted on his account, let's not forget) to use.
And it seems that in some cases that might mean he does not (yet) have a
~/.ssh even...
when repos are copied over from elsewhere, one had to run easy install
once again to make the new (OS-copied) repo contain the proper update
hook.
We eliminate this step now, using a new, empty, "hook" as a sentinel and
having "compile" check/fix all repos' hooks.
Since you have to add the repos to conf anyway, this makes it as
seamless as possible. The correct sequence now is
- (server) copy the repo at the OS level
- (admin clone) add it to conf/gitolite.conf, commit, push
conf/VERSION is programmatically created, not manually, so you shouldn't
be checking it in, which means it looks cleaner to explicitly put it in
.gitignore
Currently the pattern of expand command is line anchored. This is
different than in e.g. grep, and causes extra work to add '.*' prefix
and/or suffix in many use cases.
The new semantics now mean you might get more matches than you would
have gotten earlier. However, the expand command is still totally
undocumented, so I think it is acceptable to change the functionality.
;)
This patch removes the anchoring. So for earlier behavior the specified
pattern needs be in form of '^<pattern>$'. The default pattern is also
changed from '.*' to '^', so there might be even a small speed
improvement. =)
Signed-off-by: Teemu Matilainen <teemu.matilainen@reaktor.fi>
stupid me; committed the easy install patch on master *and* pushed,
instead of on pu...
Since I dont want to rewind master, we end up with this completely
unnecessary merge.
let expand_list be just that "expand a list", and leave checking to be
done outside.
otherwise, commit 690604d79 has the side effect of restricting refs to
$REPOPATT_PATT, and so for instance barfing on the perfectly valid
RW+ refs/(?!heads/master) = alice bob
(thanks to Teemu for catching this)
[TODO: allow a callback for a password checking function, such as
"passwd_policy_check". Question is where the function would go.
~/.gitolite.rc is the only possible place among the current set of files
but I'd rather leave that as a list of simple name=value lines for all
sorts of reasons. So maybe something like ~/.gitolite.pm (analogous to
the "gitolite.pm" in the sources I supply), which would get "require'd"
if found, and would contain all user-defined functions like this one...
needs some thinking about]
this came up in some other discussion with bremner. As usual I said no
I won't do it because I don't see any real need.
...then I realised it's just one line :)
(about this commit)
The install doc now describes both the ways of installing gitolite.
It also has a handy appendix for package maintainers describing what
they need to do.
(about the "dps" -- distro packaging support -- commit series)
This commit is the last in the chain meant to make gitolite more
friendly for package maintainers.
Frankly, I never really thought gitolite would get big enough or
important enough for someone to package it, and I always did just
the bare minimum I needed to get it working, first for myself, then
anyone who hopped onto #git and asked. As a result, it had some
quirks in terms of what is expected where and so on...
Luckily, it didn't take a lot of changes to fix it, and this series
of commits should help make it very easy to package gitolite for
system-wide use.
The old install method will now use conf/VERSION instead of src/VERSION everywhere.
The new one, if you use the builtin make file to "make branch.tar" will also create just such a file
gl-install copies
- the initial rc file to ~/.gitolite.rc if it doesn't exist
- src and hooks to GL_ADMINDIR
Make it aware of a package-based setup sequence, where the above two
change somewhat; see code diff.
This should be the last bit of change needed to prepare gitolite setup
so that a distro package maintainer does not have to fiddle too much
with code inside.
(What remains is docs, and a setup script for server-side use, to
replace the latter part of easy install)
if you have read access to the admin repo, you can say
ssh git@server info user1 [...]
Original idea and code by Karteek E. The motivation is to quickly and
easily check what perms a user has. Technically nothing that you can't
glean from the config file itself but it serves as a double check or a
mild debugging aid perhaps.
However note that the branch level rules are much more complex and they
do not, as yet, have any such "helpful" aids. Life is like that
sometimes.
Gitolite allows you to set git repo options using the "config" keyword;
see conf/example.conf for details and syntax.
However, if you are in an installation where the repo admin does not
(and should not) have shell access to the server, then allowing him to
set arbitrary repo config options *may* be a security risk -- some
config settings may allow executing arbitrary commands.
This patch fixes it, introducing a new RC variable to control the
behaviour. See conf/example.gitolite.rc for details
