<sigh> why won't people read just *one* para more...?
OK I agree the starting line was *just* misleading enough to give the opposite impression, but still, when the next para starts with "The rules are..." wouldn't you expect people would read *that* too?
This commit is contained in:
parent
9dd191ef7f
commit
dceb40a104
|
@ -475,15 +475,15 @@ Some usage hints:
|
|||
|
||||
### #mergecheck enforcing a no-merges policy
|
||||
|
||||
Some people want to enforce a no-merges policy for various reasons. This
|
||||
behaviour can be enabled by suffixing an "M" to the end of any permission
|
||||
starting with `RW` (i.e., all of them except `R`). So for instance, `RW`
|
||||
becomes `RWM`, and `RW+` becomes `RW+M`, etc.
|
||||
Some people want to enforce a no-merges policy for various reasons. The new
|
||||
"M" qualifier can be used to specify who is allowed to push merge commits.
|
||||
This works just like "C" and "D" in the previous section, so **please read
|
||||
that for a more detailed description** and apply the same ideas, (including
|
||||
the `@all` trick!) to "M" for "allow merge commits".
|
||||
|
||||
The rules are exactly the same as for "C" and "D": once a repo has an "M"
|
||||
qualifier tied to any access rule, all rules for that repo are subject to
|
||||
merge checking, and merge commits will only be allowed when the rule has the
|
||||
"M" qualifier.
|
||||
The only other thing to remember is that this qualifier, if used, goes at the
|
||||
end of any permission starting with `RW` (i.e., all of them except `R`). For
|
||||
example, `RW` becomes `RWM`, `RW+` becomes `RW+M`, `RW+CD` becomes `RW+CDM`.
|
||||
|
||||
## summary: permissions
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue