2009-10-04 05:55:20 +02:00
|
|
|
# delegating access control responsibilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Thanks to jeromeag for forcing me to think through this...]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### lots of repos, lots of users
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gitolite tries to make it easy to manage access to lots of users and repos,
|
2009-10-14 10:39:34 +02:00
|
|
|
exploiting commonalities wherever possible. (The example in the section
|
|
|
|
"simpler syntax" in [this page][ml] should give you an idea). As you can see,
|
|
|
|
it lets you specify bits and pieces of the access control separately -- i.e.,
|
|
|
|
*all* the access specs for a certain repo need not be together; they can be
|
2009-10-04 05:55:20 +02:00
|
|
|
scattered, which makes it easier to manage the sort of slice and dice needed
|
|
|
|
in that example.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-14 10:39:34 +02:00
|
|
|
[ml]: http://github.com/sitaramc/gitolite/blob/pu/doc/3-faq-tips-etc.mkd
|
2009-10-04 05:55:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But eventually the config file will become too big. If you let only one
|
|
|
|
person have control, he could become a bottleneck. If you give it to multiple
|
|
|
|
people, they might make mistakes or stomp on each others' work accidentally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The best way is to divide up the config file and give parts of it to different
|
2009-10-05 14:22:33 +02:00
|
|
|
people.
|
2009-10-04 05:55:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-05 14:22:33 +02:00
|
|
|
Ideally, we would delegate authority for *groups* of repos, not individual
|
|
|
|
repos, otherwise it doesn't scale. It would also be nice if we could prevent
|
|
|
|
an admin from creating access rules for *any* repo in the system -- i.e., set
|
|
|
|
limits on what repos he can control. This would be a nice "security" feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delegation offers a way to do all that. Note that delegated admins cannot
|
|
|
|
create or remove users, not can they define new repos. They can only define
|
|
|
|
access control rules for a set of repos they have been given authority for.
|
2009-10-04 05:55:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### splitting up the config file into fragments
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-05 14:22:33 +02:00
|
|
|
It's easier to show how it all works with an example instead of long
|
|
|
|
descriptions.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-04 05:55:20 +02:00
|
|
|
To start with, recall that gitolite allows you to specify **groups** (of users
|
|
|
|
or repos, same syntax). So the basic idea is that the main config file
|
|
|
|
(`~/.gitolite/conf/gitolite.conf` by default) will specify some repo groups:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# group your projects/repos however you want
|
|
|
|
@webbrowser_repos = firefox lynx
|
|
|
|
@webserver_repos = apache nginx
|
|
|
|
@malware_repos = conficker storm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# any other config as usual, including access control lines for any of the
|
|
|
|
# above projects or groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now just create these files (assuming default `$GL_ADMINDIR` location):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~/.gitolite/conf/fragments/webbrowser_repos.conf
|
|
|
|
~/.gitolite/conf/fragments/webserver_repos.conf
|
|
|
|
~/.gitolite/conf/fragments/malware_repos.conf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within each of those files put in whatever access control rules you want for
|
|
|
|
the repos that are members of that group. Notice that the basenames of the
|
|
|
|
files must be exactly the same as the name of the corresponding repo group in
|
|
|
|
the main config file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For instance, `~/.gitolite/conf/fragments/webbrowser_repos.conf` would only
|
|
|
|
contain access control for firefox and lynx. If it referenced any other repo
|
|
|
|
(say "storm") those lines would be ignored (and a warning message generated).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you run the compile script (`src/gl-compile-conf`), the **net effect is
|
|
|
|
as if you appended the contents of all the "fragment" files, in alphabetical
|
|
|
|
order, to the bottom of the main file**.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Except of course, while processing a fragment, it will ignore attempts to set
|
|
|
|
permissions for repos that are not members of the same-named "repo group").
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And that's basically it, in the simplest usage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
["But WAIT, there's MORE!"][bwtm]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[bwtm]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Valenti#But_Wait.21_There.27s_More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### delegating ownership of fragments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Splitting up the file does help, but there's also that little security issue
|
|
|
|
-- anyone can make any change to any "fragment", unless you (once again) go
|
|
|
|
back to Unix permissions to keep them separate.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-14 10:39:34 +02:00
|
|
|
Fixing that requires using "push-to-admin", which is the default (and only)
|
|
|
|
method to make config changes in gitosis.
|
2009-10-04 05:55:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-14 10:39:34 +02:00
|
|
|
For a long time, I refused to make "push to admin" the default because it's a
|
|
|
|
support nightmare. Don't get me wrong -- it's a great feature, and I use it
|
|
|
|
myself, but the learning curve was too steep to make it *required*.
|
2009-10-04 05:55:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-14 10:39:34 +02:00
|
|
|
But eventually I figured out a way to front-load the darn ssh problem that
|
|
|
|
everyone on #git seemed to run up against, created a nice "easy install"
|
|
|
|
script, and made "push to admin" the default.
|
2009-10-04 05:55:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-14 10:39:34 +02:00
|
|
|
So now, you just add these lines to the main config file, assuming Alice is in
|
|
|
|
charge of all web browser development projects, Bob takes care of web servers,
|
|
|
|
and Mallory, as [tradition][abe] dictates, is in charge of malware ;-)
|
2009-10-04 05:55:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[abe]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_and_Bob#List_of_characters
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-14 10:39:34 +02:00
|
|
|
# these 2 lines were probably present already
|
2009-10-04 05:55:20 +02:00
|
|
|
repo gitolite-admin
|
|
|
|
RW+ = sitaram
|
|
|
|
# now add these 3 lines
|
|
|
|
RW webbrowser_repos = alice
|
|
|
|
RW webserver_repos = bob
|
|
|
|
RW malware_repos = mallory
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-05 14:22:33 +02:00
|
|
|
# you need these lines too -- they define what repos alice/bob/mallory are
|
|
|
|
# allowed to control
|
|
|
|
@webbrowser_repos = firefox lynx
|
|
|
|
@webserver_repos = apache nginx
|
|
|
|
@malware_repos = conficker storm
|
|
|
|
|
2009-10-14 10:39:34 +02:00
|
|
|
As you can see, **for each repo group** you want to delegate authority over,
|
|
|
|
there's a **branch with the same name** in the `gitolite-admin` repo. If you
|
2009-10-05 14:22:33 +02:00
|
|
|
have write access to that branch, you are allowed to define rules for repos in
|
2009-10-14 10:39:34 +02:00
|
|
|
that repo group.
|
2009-10-04 05:55:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2009-10-05 14:22:33 +02:00
|
|
|
In other words, we use gitolite's per-branch permissions to "enforce" the
|
|
|
|
separation between the delegated configs!
|
2009-10-04 05:55:20 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's how to use this in practice:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Alice clones the `gitolite-admin` repo, creates (if not already created) and
|
|
|
|
checks out a new branch called `webbrowser_repos`, and adds a file called
|
|
|
|
`conf/fragments/webbrowser_repos.conf` in that branch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* (the rest of the contents of that branch do not matter; she can keep
|
|
|
|
all the other files or delete all of them -- it doesn't make any
|
|
|
|
difference. Only that one specific file is used).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* she writes in this file any access control rules for the "firefox" and
|
|
|
|
"lynx" repos. She should not write access rules for any other project --
|
|
|
|
they will be ignored
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Alice then commits and pushes this branch to the `gitolite-admin` repo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naturally, a successful push invokes the post-update hook that you installed
|
|
|
|
(while setting up [push-to-admin][ptd]). Here's what it does:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* for each branch, say `br`, of the `gitolite-admin` repo, it checks if
|
|
|
|
there is a file called `conf/fragments/br.conf`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* if there is, it extracts it and copies it with the exact same name and
|
|
|
|
path, into the `$GL_ADMINDIR` directory (`~/.gitolite` by default)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After that, it runs the compile script, and things work the same as described
|
|
|
|
in the previous section.
|